Two sales colleagues run into each other at a networking event and naturally begin discussing the challenges they’ve been facing. The topic quickly turns to supply-chain issues both companies are dealing with. One colleague suggests a solution: what if both companies agree to increase their prices by 15% to offset the lean months caused by supply disruptions? While this might seem like a logical way to deal with rising costs, the conversation treads into dangerous territory—collusion and antitrust violations.
This scenario highlights a critical dilemma for companies: how to responsibly adjust prices to reflect shortages without crossing the line into illegal pricing agreements or sharing sensitive inside information.
Supply chain disruptions can wreak havoc on a company’s ability to meet customer demand, leading to higher costs and slimmer margins. In this case, the two colleagues were likely seeking ways to cover their losses and stabilize business during tough times. But discussing coordinated price hikes between competitors is not the answer.
Price-fixing, or agreeing with competitors to set prices at a certain level, is a clear violation of antitrust laws. Even informal conversations between colleagues at industry events can be interpreted as collusion if they involve discussions around adjusting prices in a way that limits competition.
Antitrust laws are designed to protect free market competition by prohibiting practices like price-fixing, bid-rigging, and market allocation. When companies collude to set prices or divide up markets, it reduces competition, increases costs for consumers, and undermines the integrity of the marketplace.
In the situation described above, one colleague’s suggestion to raise prices by 15% across both companies is a textbook example of price-fixing. Even if the idea was well-intentioned as a way to deal with supply shortages, it could still lead to severe legal consequences for both parties involved.
Violating antitrust laws can result in hefty fines, legal penalties, and even jail time for individuals involved. Beyond the legal risks, companies found guilty of collusion often suffer damage to their reputations, which can lead to loss of business and customer trust.
In addition to suggesting price coordination, the colleague’s comments also reveal that they now have inside information about the other company’s supply chain struggles. Sharing business dealings, like specific supply-chain challenges or pricing strategies, with competitors can be risky. When companies have access to inside knowledge about their rivals, it can influence their business decisions in a way that limits fair competition.
For example, knowing that a competitor is struggling with supply shortages might lead a company to take advantage of that knowledge by adjusting their own pricing or distribution strategies to gain a market advantage. This type of behavior could also lead to legal scrutiny.
Companies do have the right to adjust their prices to reflect changes in supply and demand. However, they must do so independently of their competitors, without engaging in conversations that could lead to coordinated actions. Here’s how companies can responsibly manage supply chain issues and pricing:
To stay compliant with antitrust laws, sales professionals should avoid discussing the following topics with competitors:
While it may be tempting to coordinate with competitors to navigate challenging times, the risks far outweigh the potential benefits. Antitrust laws are in place to ensure a level playing field where companies compete on their own merits, rather than colluding to manipulate the market. Instead of seeking agreements with competitors, companies should focus on innovating, finding efficiencies in their supply chains, and maintaining transparency with customers.
The bottom line: Always act independently, even when facing tough challenges like supply chain disruptions. Protecting your company from legal risks and maintaining your integrity in the marketplace will pay off in the long run. By staying compliant and transparent, you can manage price adjustments without violating antitrust laws.